+1, good solution. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > We will have a proper minor release and a preview of 0.10. After all, > > a good compromise. > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@icloud.com> > > wrote: > > > Robert's suggestion looks good. +1 > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > >> On Aug 26, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 seems to be a viable solution > > >> > > >>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 at 14:51 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> That sounds like a very good compromise. > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm +1 for Robert's proposal as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> 2015-08-26 14:46 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I very much like Robert's suggestion. This way we can proceed with > > the > > >>>>> 0.9.1 release as planned for the remaining part and have > > >>> 0.10-milestone1 > > >>>>> with the fix. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> What about the others? Please give feedback early to allow me to > > >>> proceed > > >>>>> with the release. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >
