I don't think we had to many API breaking changes. If everyone was careful, maybe these are even it: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
I added my breaking stuff there. And of course the whole Timestamp thing is a change, but it does not affect the normal source interface. On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 at 10:24 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > We can also try and "rebase" a fork of the maser to the "0.9" branch, where > we select something like 70%-80% of the commits (all fixes and reworks) and > drop the API beaking ones. > > Let me try this and see how feasible it is... > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I think you are the best one to assess this at the moment since you are > > doing the hard work of back porting the changes. > > > > Are you suggesting this, because it is a) less error-prone/easier or b) > > faster to do? > > > > For those that haven't followed the discussion: Stephan is back porting > > fixes for the streaming fault tolerance. There is consensus that the > > changes need to be in the bug fix release. So it's definitely not an > option > > to skip it. > > > > In general I would like to keep our established process of back porting > > fixes to the release-X branch. But given the importance of the to be back > > ported fixes and the difficulty of back porting it, I think your > suggestion > > is reasonable. We have to be very careful to not change behaviour between > > minor releases though. > > > > We also have to think about the following points if we fork off from > > master: > > - The startup script behaviour has changed > > - HA ZooKeeper setup needs to be removed > > >
