I would like to release Flink 0.9.1 soon. There were some annoying bugs discovered recently, that should be addressed in a bug fix release.
I have the following bugs in my mind: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2555 (Hadoop Input/Output Formats are unable to access secured HDFS clusters) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2386 (Implement Kafka connector using the new Kafka Consumer API) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2543 (State handling does not support deserializing classes through the UserCodeClassloader) I'm working on providing a fix for FLINK-2543 asap (I have this particular bug already fixed, but my test is is triggering another one) On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckone...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I did a (thin) fix for > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > window > > and also added a PR <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/994>. > > Regards, > Gábor > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since the > > 0.9.0 release: > > > > c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to ObjectArrayTypeInfo > > 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects ascending > > flag > > acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop mapred > > wrappers > > 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base URL > > 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash > > buckets on recursive builds > > 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from > > GroupedActiveDiscretizer > > d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on YARN > > 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ > > 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function > > calls to wrapped functions > > d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation > > b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example > > 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in > > ParameterTool > > > > I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain > important > > fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. > > > > As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of them. > > Except for > > > > "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > regarding > > Null-Values" > > > > because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the 0.9.0 > > release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it again > > together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. > > > > Cheers, > > Max > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. > > > > > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and see > if > > > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. > > > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Fabian > > > > > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > Hey all! > > > > > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 > > > there > > > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two > were > > > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release > > > urgently. > > > > > > > > What's do you think about this? > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. > > > > > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: > > > > > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > > > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > > > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > > > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the > last > > > > window > > > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > > > regarding > > > > Null-Values > > > > > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > > > > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes > > > where > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them > with > > > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should > > get > > > > into the release as well. > > > > > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus > > > about > > > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing > > > started. > > > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
