Ya,If takes proposal 2, the the name overlap is one issue from java and scala examples. Your suggestion sounds good,gives different package for java and scala examples.
but drops the subpackages, i have some different points: there are many examples use the similar directory structure such as:storm-compatibility-examples,streaming-examples..., it would be better to keep consistent. I found many places taking reference from the two artifactId(flink-java-examples and flink-scala-examples). For avoiding some unpredictable issues for new starters, so i prefer to "proposal 1", keep two projects. BTW, my personal opinion: currently scala be acknowledged by more and more developers, in future there may have some different examples for scala. Thanks for all guys' very good input. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/jira-FLINK-2493-Simplify-names-of-example-program-JARs-tp7495p7571.html Sent from the Apache Flink Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
