I second Ufuk and Chensnay. Please provide us with a benchmark. I have a hard time to believe your implementation, along with the overhead that comes with it, will improve the streaming performance.
Please, feel free to prove us wrong :) On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chesnay Schepler < chesnay.schep...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > -.- > > if you look at into this issue that you opened > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2471 you were given opinions > from 2 separate people, with arguments, that the performance > improvement(TBD) is either a) nonexistant or b) negligible. All you did was > disregard those basically saying "no I'm right.", and not much else. And > now we're here starting at square one. > > SO, my suggestion is this: You said you could test the performance, so go > ahead. Then we can talk. > > Regards, > a slightly disgruntled Chesnay Schepler > > > On 12.08.2015 11:33, Fangfengbin wrote: > >> Hello >> >> >> >> Some operators call system.currentTimeMillis() frequently and it is cost >> performance. >> >> I want to use a thread to call System.currentTimeMillis and update a long >> variable millTime. All other module do not need call >> System.currentTimeMillis() and can get millTime directly. >> >> I want to know your suggestion. Thank you very much. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Fengbin Fang >> >> >> >> >
