This is very cool!

Would also love to see a blog post on Gelly at some point, perhaps
finishing off with the roadmap

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Andra Lungu <lungu.an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Apache TinkerPop made it to the wish-list :)
> Thanks, Fabian!
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
> wrote:
>
> > You're definitely right Fabian +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Integration with Apache TinkerPop3 could also be interesting.
> > > TinkerPop3 is an API for transactional and analytical graph processing
> > and
> > > supported by several Graph engines/databases.
> > >
> > > It might be interesting to see if/how Gelly's and TinkerPop's concepts
> > > match and think about whether it makes sense to integrate the two
> > projects
> > > in some way.
> > >
> > > 2015-05-18 12:20 GMT+02:00 Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
> > g...@apache.org
> > > >:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Great job putting together this roadmap!
> > > >
> > > > Regarding 1) you may find this work relevant:
> > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00626v1
> > > >
> > > > Regarding 2) the semi-streaming model allows polylog(n) passes.
> > > > If you allow only one pass, it's a streaming model.
> > > > In addition, I think models such as the turnstile/fully dynamic (with
> > > > addition and deletion) would be more appropriate than the incremental
> > > one.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding 5) (when combined with 2) there are some good recent
> > algorithms
> > > > for partitioning that you might want to look at.
> > > > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2556213
> > > > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2339722
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gianmarco
> > > >
> > > > On 18 May 2015 at 12:42, Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you Andra for putting together this nice document and for
> > > sharing!
> > > > >
> > > > > Gelly is already in a state that matches the basic functionality of
> > > > > existing distributed graph libraries. We're very happy for this and
> > > also
> > > > > very grateful to everyone who has contributed so far!
> > > > >
> > > > > We are also very excited to keep on extending Gelly and our vision
> is
> > > to
> > > > > turn it into something much more than "yet another library for
> > running
> > > > > PageRank-like algorithms". The document that Andra has shared
> > contains
> > > > > ongoing work and our ideas on mid- and long-term plans, in order to
> > > make
> > > > > this happen :)
> > > > >
> > > > > We would love to get the community's feedback on this, so please
> feel
> > > > free
> > > > > to comment on the doc or discuss individual points here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Vasia.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 18 May 2015 at 11:01, Andra Lungu <lungu.an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Squirrels,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following document is intended to give you an insight on
> where
> > > > > Flink's
> > > > > > Graph API, Gelly, is at the moment and especially on the
> direction
> > in
> > > > > which
> > > > > > it's heading in the near future.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11ovK1xZZTl3Qinw6Ud1rqpaDhTvRHDv8PWBzcHITFkM/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We would love to hear about your comments/ suggestions/ additions
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > wish-list :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Andra
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to