Hi,
no, I think the two are unrelated. But that's another problem we need
to tackle then.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Szabó Péter <nemderogator...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> our intern, Pablo pointed out that there is some problem with mixed
> windowing policies. When you write
>   ...
>   .window(Count ...)
>   .every(Time ...)
>   .mapWindow(...)
>   ...
>
> The result makes no sense, as the window is not of the specified length.
> Maybe, there is some conflict between Time and Count logic. Is this a
> related problem to yours?
>
> Peter
>
> 2015-04-29 21:15 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
>
>> I am on it, yes. :D
>> On Apr 29, 2015 8:31 PM, "Gyula Fóra" <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey,
>> > You are right, so there seems to be some error in the logic that checks
>> for
>> > the end of the slide.
>> > I checked the count pre-reducer and the error there is clear, but if I
>> fix
>> > it it breaks some tests so I think some other stuff must not work
>> properly
>> > either.
>> >
>> > I cannot work on this until I get back from holiday, it would be good if
>> > you could look into it.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Gyula
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Oh, I saw them, but in updateCurrent() (both grouped and non-grouped)
>> > > the else path is never taken when I run the windowed WordCount
>> > > example.
>> > >
>> > > I have a branch where I just throw a RuntimeException in the else
>> > > branches and the whole things still works: mvn verify doesn't fail,
>> > > the examples still run. When looking at the behaviour of the
>> > > functions, it seems clear to me that the else path can never be taken.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > > Hey,
>> > > >
>> > > > They actually work :P Although I have to admit I need to do some
>> > > > refactoring of the method names and parameters.
>> > > >
>> > > > I made some quick refactoring and added some comments for the key
>> > > methods:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/mbalassi/flink/blob/dfa028ce5102b1f0d098eaec6c4b4d3744bee379/flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/windowing/windowbuffer/SlidingPreReducer.java#L96
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/mbalassi/flink/blob/dfa028ce5102b1f0d098eaec6c4b4d3744bee379/flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/windowing/windowbuffer/SlidingPreReducer.java#L105
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/mbalassi/flink/blob/dfa028ce5102b1f0d098eaec6c4b4d3744bee379/flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/windowing/windowbuffer/SlidingPreReducer.java#L132
>> > > >
>> > > > Those three parts contain the key logic, and now the method names
>> > should
>> > > > make more sense as well :)
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Gyula
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> aljos...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi,
>> > > >> one of my notorious (by now) investigative questions: How do these
>> > > >> work? To meet it seems that they do not perform any actual pre
>> > > >> aggregation but just keep all the elements in a LinkedList
>> > > >> (non-grouped case) or HashMap (grouped-case) and aggregate the
>> > > >> elements when the window is to be emitted.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Am I missing something again? :D
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >> Aljoscha
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to