Sounds good, thx Robert!

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

> I tagged it to affect 0.8.x.
> I'll backport the fix to 0.8, then we can mark it as fixed for that release
> as well.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah thanks. I assume this need to be tagged for 0.8.2 release?
> >
> > On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > > > >
> > > > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> m...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a
> > > 0.8.2
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor
> issue.
> > We
> > > > > could
> > > > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example,
> we
> > > > could
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release
> that
> > > > also
> > > > > > required some testing..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > > this,
> > > > > > > Robert?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8?
> > As
> > > > you
> > > > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than
> > > empty.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the
> system
> > > and
> > > > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC
> > would
> > > > not
> > > > > > > need a lot of testing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1
> release,
> > > but
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking
> > to
> > > > > 0.8. I
> > > > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as
> the
> > > > > primary
> > > > > > > download.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > – Ufuk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to