Hey Mathias,

Thanks, this is a really nice contribution. I just scrolled through the
code, but I really like it and big thanks for the the tests for the
examples.

The rebase Fabian suggested would help a lot when merging.



On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
>
> this is really cool!I especially like that you can use Storm code within a
> Flink streaming program :-)
>
> One thing that might be good to do rather soon is to collect all your
> commits and put them on top of a fresh forked Flink master branch.
> When merging we cannot change the history and try to put only fast-forward
> commits on top of the master branch.
> As time goes on it becomes more likely that you run into merge issues when
> cherry-picking the commits.
>
> 2015-04-02 21:09 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hey Henry,
> >
> > you can check out the files here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink/tree/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-storm-compatibility
> > ... so yes, they are located in the flink-streaming directory .. which
> is a
> > good place for now.
> > Once we move flink-streaming out of staging, we might want to keep the
> > storm compat in staging.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > HI Matthias,
> > >
> > > Where do you put the code for the Storm compatibility? Under streams
> > > module directory?
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Matthias J. Sax
> > > <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > Hi @all,
> > > >
> > > > I started to work on an compatibility layer to run Storm Topologies
> on
> > > > Flink. I just pushed a first beta:
> > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/tree/flink-storm-compatibility
> > > >
> > > > Please check it out, and let me know how you like it. In this first
> > > > version, I tried to code without changing too many things in the
> > > > existing code. However, a deeper integration would be nice.
> > > >
> > > > There are many things that do not work yet. Currently, only shuffle
> and
> > > > fieldsGrouping is supported (and only Storm's default output stream).
> > > > Furthermore, topologies must be "simple", ie, they cannot be
> configured
> > > > with a Config object and Storm meta information (ie, TopologyContext)
> > is
> > > > also not there.
> > > >
> > > > The layer can be used to integrate existing Spouts and/or Bolts as
> > Flink
> > > > operators into a regular Flink program. Furthermore, a whole Storm
> > > > topology can be executed by switching from TopologyBuilder to
> > > > FlinkTopologyBuilder and from
> LocalCluster/NimbusClient/StormSubmitter
> > > > to FlinkLocalCluster/FlinkClient/FlinkStormSubmitter.
> > > >
> > > > Examples of both cases are given as ITCases.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >   Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to