+Table 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
> +Table > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks Henry. :D > > > > +Relation > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > +Table > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi < > > balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +DataTable > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. < > > >> volker.ma...@tu-berlin.de> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +Table > > >> > > > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) ) > > >> > > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twal...@apache.org] > > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28 > > >> > An: dev@flink.apache.org > > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation > > >> > > > >> > +Table API > > >> > > > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than > > >> > Relation. > > >> > > > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > >> > > +Table API / Table > > >> > > > > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people > with > > a > > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more > the > > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am > 25.03.2015 > > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fhue...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > > > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear. > > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen. > > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote > > with > > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done." > > >> > >> > > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they > > appear. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> --- > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, > we > > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I > > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and > > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then? > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> – Ufuk > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri > > >> > >>> <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>>> +Relation > > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" < > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > >>>>> +Relation > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> PS > > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :) > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek > > >> > >>>>> <aljos...@apache.org> > > >> > >>>>> wrote: > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and > > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API. > > >> > >>>>>> > > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: > > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable. > > >> > >>>>>> > > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours. > > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen. > > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new > vote > > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done. > > >> > >>>>>> > > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these: > > >> > >>>>>> > > >> > >>>>>> +Relation > > >> > >>>>>> +Table > > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable > > >> > >>>>>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >
