I'm already always sticking to the official Scala style guide, with the exception of 100 line length. On Mar 16, 2015 3:27 PM, "Till Rohrmann" <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for stricter Java code styles. I haven't looked into the Google Code > Style but maybe we make it easier for new contributors if we apply a coding > style which is somehow known. > > +1 for line length of 100 for Scala code. I think it makes code review on > GitHub easier. > > For the Scala style, we could stick to official style guidelines [1]. > > [1] http://docs.scala-lang.org/style/ > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckone...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 for the stricter Java code styles. > > > > We should not forget about providing code formatter settings for Eclipse > > and Intellij IDEA (as mentioned above). > > That would help a lot. > > > > (Of course if we'll use Google Code Style, they already provide such > files > > < > > > https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/source/browse/trunk/intellij-java-google-style.xml > > > > > .) > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:45 PM Alexander Alexandrov < > > alexander.s.alexand...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 for not limiting the line length. > > > > > > 2015-03-16 14:39 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > +1 for not limiting the line length. Everyone should have a good > sense > > to > > > > break lines. When in exceptional cases people violate this, it is > > usually > > > > for a good reason. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for enforcing a more strict Java code style. However, let's not > > > > > introduce a line legth of 100 like in Scala. I think that's hurting > > > > > readability of the code. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, March 14, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm in favor of strict coding styles. And I like the google > > style. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 I would like that. We essentially all agree that we want more > > > > > > homogeneity and I think strict rules are the only way to go. > Since > > > this > > > > > is > > > > > > a very subjective matter it makes sense to go with something > > > (somewhat) > > > > > > well > > > > > > established like the Google code style. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
