Hi All,

I am not sure about "Interactive Scala shell". I just feel like adding
feature like this may look like following Spark.

We could probably focus more on CLI and client libraries toward better
and scale backend execution engine compare to Spark.

- Henry

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I very much like the "PIG Journal" here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PIG/Pig+Journal
> Its basically a nice view (however outdated in that case) on whats going on
> in the PIG community. You can see finished features on the top, current
> features being developed in the middle and ideas in the end.
>
> The document posted by Stephan is a good start to create a "Flink Journal".
> I agree with Fabian that the estimates are very optimistic. Implementing
> all these features including unit tests, documentation and testing a takes
> a lot of time.
> I would suggest to only add estimates (finish dates) to features which are
> currently work in progress.
> The remainder ("ideas") can have time estimates in months but should not
> have finish dates. Similarly to Pig, we should put a disclaimer on top that
> we do not guarantee for any feature being developed.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the roadmap should show the long-term development goals of Flink,
>> i.e., show that we are going for a ML library, SQL support, Batch-Streaming
>> integration, etc.
>>
>> Right now, it is quite detailed and with very optimistic time estimates,
>> IMO.
>> If we would do everything in time, we would be done with the roadmap in  Q3
>> 2015...
>> I would not even put a time on all issues, esp. on things which depend on
>> other developments (which might not even have started). Also I would make
>> the estimates more coarse-grained. For short-term goals we could use
>> quarters, everything does not need an estimate, IMO. Issues that will be
>> solved in two months don't even need to be listed.
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-08 7:50 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > I added some text about my work on the Logical Query feature.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone!
>> > >
>> > > It is time we bring the Flink roadmap up to speed with what has
>> happened
>> > in
>> > > the last months and what further goals features ideas have come up.
>> > >
>> > > The link below leads to a Google Doc that contains an initial set of
>> > > suggestions that some of the committers have come up with. Please share
>> > > your opinion on those suggestions and feel free to suggest additional
>> > items
>> > > to put on the roadmap.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QZ0NJC03pOBqE6vbK1Ot4bXwoBcszIqzbZ8a6B5vSEo/edit?usp=sharing
>> > >
>> > > This is specifically open to everyone, not only committers. The link
>> > should
>> > > allow everyone to add suggestions and comments to the doc (but not to
>> > edit
>> > > it directly).
>> > >
>> > > For new suggestions, it would help a lot if you could also mention
>> > whether
>> > > you would be available to help out with that feature or idea - that
>> > helps a
>> > > lot with prioritizing and estimate the time line.
>> > >
>> > > For general suggestions to the "road mapping" process, please respond
>> to
>> > > this mail.
>> > >
>> > > Greetings and happy drafting!
>> > > Stephan
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to