Let's try it this way. I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means that
someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have consensus and
will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done ASAP.
I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive. We're
not in the middle of a release or lots of changes. Maybe we won't even change
the website until someone complains just to see if anyone actually goes to
those pages.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" <m...@olafkrueger.net> wrote:
Hi Carlos,
yes, the migration is mandatory.
They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings.
But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it before
this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible.
Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before
February 7th.
Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that INFRA
could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other
communities.
If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a consensus
about this and we need to inform INFRA.
To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way.
Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-)
Thanks,
Olaf
--
Sent from:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562&sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3D&reserved=0
