Carlos, I will review the changes in framework and decide on Monday in what direction go.
Thank you! :) On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, 18:03 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > If there's some delta, better to make a 4.16.1 instead a 4.17 > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > 2017-10-27 17:58 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > I'm not sure I understand the question. > > > > I think we make a new branch with the version number in the name each > > time. We could probably delete old branches once they get merged with > > develop and master. > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > On 10/27/17, 12:55 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >Alex, > > > > > >I prefer create branch, but question if I do this on this branch I > should > > >make the changes to 4.17 or we are testing still 4.16 by this branch ? > > > > > >Om, > > > > > >Yes it would be awesome if you could help with tests! > > > > > >I will probably start from the installer. > > > > > >Thanks, Piotr > > > > > > > > >2017-10-27 8:34 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > > > >> IMO, there is so little activity on the develop branch that a release > > >> branch is not required. > > >> > > >> Good luck, > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 10/26/17, 11:08 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > > >> Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> >+1 please go ahead. I can help testing. > > >> > > > >> >I think the process for the Installer release are a bit looser. You > > >>can > > >> >start the VOTE thread as soon as possible. Especially since this > issue > > >> >has > > >> >been around for a while. > > >> > > > >> >Thanks, > > >> >Om > > >> > > > >> >On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > >> ><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi Folks, > > >> >> > > >> >> Lately I was able to fix ugly bug [1] where on Windows Apache Flex > > >> >> Installer was failing to download Adobe Air greater than 23. Along > > >>with > > >> >> that fix I had to also make fix in SDK [2]. I believe this two > > >>critical > > >> >> fixes is worth to release. > > >> >> > > >> >> Anyone is against that to start release process ? According that > > >>guide > > >> >>[3] > > >> >> I should start [LAST CALL] discussion as an first step, but > probably > > >> >>before > > >> >> that I need to prepare separate branch for SDK ? What's with > > >>installer > > >> >>do I > > >> >> need to do this the same ? > > >> >> > > >> >> [1] > > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fissues.a > > >> >>pache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35295&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7C775f0538f7d64936 > > >> >>04a008d51d014756%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63644681369 > > >> >>4500038&sdata=sMKk4NX5obM11SVbLqS46PVB8%2FiEG2%2FhjE%2F9fAvLpiA%3D& > > >> reserv > > >> >>ed=0 > > >> >> [2] > > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fissues.a > > >> >>pache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35364&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7C775f0538f7d64936 > > >> >>04a008d51d014756%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63644681369 > > >> > > >>>>4500038&sdata=IuuiKrQPblxvtKg3K2YR5M070EpuQx > > IKt3njPWGOQLA%3D&reserved=0 > > >> >> [3] > > >> >> > > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.ap > > >> >>ache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FA&data=02% > > >> 7C01%7C%7C775f0538f7d6 > > >> >>493604a008d51d014756%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364468 > > >> >>13694500038&sdata=Zwo3%2BIN4bIhG0lvSts8SPdcj25uRWWEQz > > >> Tmh%2FYDiKsA%3D&rese > > >> >>rved=0+ > > >> >> guide+to+the+Apache+Flex+release+process > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks, > > >> >> Piotr > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > >Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > >mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > >skype: zarzycki10 > > > > > >LinkedIn: > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked > > >in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C379863aa5f7f42c1088a08d51d10 > > 27ab% > > >7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446877584877115&sdata= > > sutF > > >UQ96b7Vq8KdT6lelRFHI4cPDLGXN8%2BH9d%2BGfeu4%3D&reserved=0 > > ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fpl.linke > > >din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02% > > 7C01%7C%7C379863aa5f7f42c10 > > >88a08d51d1027ab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364468775848 > > >77115&sdata=aXnZt9vbXtSnJMeKCfpbiR90YyCxkCOxn3mQxmyhZ0c%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > >GitHub: > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co > > >m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C379863aa5f7f42c1088a08d51d10 > > 27ab%7Cf > > >a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446877584877115&sdata= > > HvOjeE3 > > >tgn9tA4j0%2BwHYnNL5bvkW03dEVGRjn0AFuRg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > > Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! <https://avant2.es/#video> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje > <https://maps.google.com/?q=ecibido+este+mensaje&entry=gmail&source=g> por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. >
