Hi - I am mentoring the Pulsar podling which is using Gitbox and a git wiki. They came to Apache with an existing github project. They gave Infra admin rights and then they simply moved over.
For Git we will need to associate our Apache ids to our Github ids at id.apache.org. We need to request Git box from Infra as it is in a limited case by case basis since it is still new. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > OK, I have asked for > royale-asjs > royale-tourjs > royale-typedefs > royale-compiler > > I will request Git website instead of SVN. > > I will not request a wiki at this time. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/21/17, 9:26 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Github has a wiki feature. Although I haven't seen any other Apache >> project use it. >> >> I hope we can use it as part of the Gitbox workflow. >> >> The good thing is that this would make it easier for anyone to add stuff >> onto the wiki without having deal with confluence, karma etc. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >>> On Sep 21, 2017 9:10 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> 1) royale-asjs just so we can expand later if needed. I like >>> royale-compiler. >>> 2) Let's get off of SVN! >>> ‹peter >>> >>>> On 9/21/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>> We have to decide a few more things for setup: >>>> >>>> 1) our current repos are named flex-asjs, flex-typedefs, etc. I >>> assume we >>>> want them renamed to royale-asjs, royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs, >>>> royale-falcon? >>>> >>>> Or do we want to change the "last names" as well? >>>> >>>> royale-framework, royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs, royale-compiler >>>> >>>> 2) The flex.apache.org website is still on SVN. Do we want to use Git >>> for >>>> Royale? I think yes. >>>> >>>> 3) Do we want a Confluence Wiki or are there wiki-equivalents in >>> GitHub? >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 9/21/17, 2:27 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Let's wait for their response. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017, 11:17 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In the sub task I asked if we "must" use JIRA or can use GH Issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/21/17, 2:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe we should have discussion whether we need Jira for new >>>>>> project? >>>>>>>> Maybe we should use Github only? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That sound like a plan. KISS [1] all the way ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://
