Carlos, If you will need any help and my time allows let me know. :)
Piotr On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 09:29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was > the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine. > > :) > > Carlos > > 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > > Thanks Piotr. > > > > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-) > > > > Harbs > > > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Piotr > > > > > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > > > >> Justin voted. > > >> > > >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. > > >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. > > >> > > >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. > > >> Limber on 6 out of 12. > > >> > > >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads > > have > > >> 2. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Piotr changed his vote. > > >>> > > >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at > 13. > > >>> Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. > > >>> > > >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > > >>> > > >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they > > aren't > > >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with > > >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. > > >>> > > >>> -Alex > > >>> > > >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote. > > >>>> > > >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. > > >>>> > > >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > > >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. > > >>>> > > >>>> -Alex > > >>>> > > >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 > > vs > > >>>>> 12. > > >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an > adult > > >>>>> site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been > > >>>>> mentioned > > >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -Alex > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for > > Gmail. > > >>>>>> I > > >>>>>> changed it again. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote > alone > > can > > >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually > increase > > the > > >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -Alex > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> EdB > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin < > e...@ixsoftware.nl > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with > went > > >>>>>>>> before > > >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I > > can > > >>>>>>>> break > > >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE > closes, > > >>>>>>>> right?) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> EdB > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui > > >>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I > > >>>>>>>>> wanted > > >>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to > > third, > > >>>>>>>>> Royale > > >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber > > have > > >>>>>>>>> 10. > > >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), > but 3 > > >>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>> those > > >>>>>>>>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 > > >>>>>>>>> times, > > >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). > > Royale, > > >>>>>>>>> Limber > > >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will > depend > > on > > >>>>>>>>> how > > >>>>>>>>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS > either > > >>>>>>>>> given > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> other vote. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with > > >>>>>>>>> low-quality > > >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major > > >>>>>>>>> hindrance? > > >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project > is > > >>>>>>>>> already > > >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as > a > > >>>>>>>>> show > > >>>>>>>>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get > > their > > >>>>>>>>> opinion. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which > name > > >>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After > > reading > > >>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell > checker > > >>>>>>>>> redirect > > >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > > >>>>>>>>> -Alex > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit > > >>>>>>>>> h > > >>>>>>>>> u > > >>>>>>>>> b > > >>>>>>>>> . > > >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C% > > >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08 > > >>>>>>>>> d > > >>>>>>>>> 4 > > >>>>>>>>> f > > >>>>>>>>> f > > >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > > >> 7C6364143732119862 > > >>>>>>>>> 8 > > >>>>>>>>> 8 > > >>>>>>>>> & > > >>>>>>>>> s > > >>>>>>>>> > data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of > OmPrakash > > >>>>>>>>> Muppirala" > > >>>>>>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" < > dave2w...@comcast.net> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>>>>>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for > > >>>>>>>>> fork > > >>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS > > >>>>>>>>>>>> project. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the > most > > >>>>>>>>> favorite > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you > > >>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>> choose > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can > > >>>>>>>>> follow > > >>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the > > >>>>>>>>> name. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> > > >>>>>>>> I. > > >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> www.ixsoftware.nl& > > >>>>>>>> d > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>> t > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > > >>>>>>>> d > > >>>>>>>> 2 > > >>>>>>>> c > > >>>>>>>> 1 > > >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu > > >>>>>>>> % > > >>>>>>>> 2 > > >>>>>>>> B > > >>>>>>>> U > > >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 > > >>>>>>> I. > > >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> t > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> = > > >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 > > >>>>>>> c > > >>>>>>> 1 > > >>>>>>> 7 > > >>>>>>> 8 > > >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B > > >>>>>>> U > > >>>>>>> t > > >>>>>>> f > > >>>>>>> l > > >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > > skype: zarzycki10 > > > > > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. >
