Nsurgent Deliver
Carrier Braid (bunch of strands, right?) On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Royale, in my part of the world, is a low-grade line of processed food > products: styrofoam-flavored ice cream, and so on. > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Harbs, >> >> Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options. >> >> Piotr >> >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me. >> > >> > Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned. >> > >> > I personally like Limber/Limbre. >> > >> > I like Boinga in a different way. >> > >> > I think that Böja has a great ring to it. >> > >> > One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up >> to >> > three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and >> option >> > 3 for 1. >> > >> > We could then tally up the points for the winners. >> > >> > At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call >> > another vote to decide between the two with the most points. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > Harbs >> > >> > > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we >> > might >> > > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other >> > > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second >> > > candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name. >> > > >> > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to >> > this >> > > post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe >> or >> > > not. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >> > Muppirala" >> > > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting >> vote >> > >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his >> > own >> > >>> name idea and others can give him +1. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider. We >> > >> should >> > >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another >> > thread. >> > >> All this feels a bit rushed, I am having a bit of a hard time >> following >> > >> discussions/decisions. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Om >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >>> Piotr >> > >>> >> > >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki < >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone >> > >>> who >> > >>>> would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex >> world. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path >> > >>> where >> > >>>> first target will be ports the old one applications. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company >> > >>> as an >> > >>>> Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently >> they >> > >>>> change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone >> > >>> from >> > >>>> initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite >> > >>> there >> > >>>> were very good press out there in the company as in outside in >> Cracow. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such >> tremendous >> > >>>> opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - >> This is >> > >>> what >> > >>>> we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS >> for >> > >>> the >> > >>>> port, cause it provides me what I need. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks, >> > >>>> Piotr >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target >> > >>> called >> > >>>>>> "Dover". >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Are you testing the non-native speakers? >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> EdB >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> -- >> > >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> T. 06-51952295 >> > >>>>> I. >> > >>> >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www. >> ixsoftware.nl&data >> > >>> >> > =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 >> 4438794aed2c1 >> > >>> >> > 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643&sdata=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z% >> 2B%2FPa%2FHfu >> > >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D&reserved=0 >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
