Harbs, Agree to start another vote simultaneously. We have gathered proposition in this email chain, if you could get all of them. VOTE could look like that:
+1 (Name from the list) +1 (My proposition) Does this sound ok ? I'm looking into the code what would be the impact changing all the resources to get rid of Flex name. - It look so far as an big amount of work. The question is - Are we have to do this if the product name will stay as FlexJS ? Piotr 2017-09-15 9:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > I agree. > > Let’s finish the vote on the project name and we can discuss the product > (or products) name(s) later. > > I think we should start the vote on the new name options. I’m not sure > what the best format of such a vote should be. We need a culled list of > options and way of tallying up opinions. Suggestions? > > I think we should start with everyone putting forward their favorites of > the options mentioned. Once we have that, we can compile the list of > options and start a vote. > > Harbs > > > On Sep 15, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This was posted by Chris at the [VOTE] thread > >> and I know what getting rid of "flex" everywhere inside the project > would > > mean regarding refactoring and >tool support. > > > > I thought that for now we just vote for a new project name in order to > get > > rid of the word 'Flex' within the Apache project name. > > Hence I thought that there's no urgent need to replace the occurrence of > the > > word 'flex' throughout the entire codebase. > > I think that there are a lot of projects out there which were renamed and > > still contains old names in their codebase. > > > > Do I misunderstand something? > > > > Thanks, > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/ > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
