It only worked up to a point. I ran into many cases where the old compiler blew up on these issues. I spent about a month with Alex on these issues. They were very difficult to resolve.
Let’s see what Alex thinks of my latest suggestion on resolving this problem. Harbs > On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:05 PM, lizhi <s...@qq.com> wrote: > > hi， > Whether it's bug or not. But the flashplayer based AS3 language supports > this writing. And the old version of flexjs also supports this writing, > proving that it can be successfully compiled into JS code. Besides, we use > flexjs for a great reason because there are many old AS3 libraries, some of > which contain this type of writing, such as the GUI library I'm porting. If > you can't go to the old AS3 library, then flexjs will lose a lot of users. > And now the compiler has this error, did not prompt where this error, so > once there is an error, it is difficult to troubleshoot. Then again, the > best way for us to be an flexjs compiler is to implement the AS3 syntax > rules of flashplayer and flashair as much as possible, not to say that a > particular writing is bad and that it does not support this writing. And I > don't think there's any problem with the wording of static > > > > ----- > spriteflexjs.com > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/
