I don't understand your goal. What is a "full wrapper"? Many Basic component already wrap HTMLElements.
I think there is another set that has the same name as the HTML elements, like Div, A, etc. -Alex On 8/12/17, 2:56 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Changing the namespace is not enough. > >The package path of Basic is org.apache.flex.html. Unless we change the >package path of HTML to be different than Basic, classes cannot be named >the same… > >> On Aug 13, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Namespace for HTML components. >> >> The list of HTML components is not complete. >> >> For example, Label does not exist in HTML. It only exists in Basic. The >>Label there inserts various formatting which is normally expected. >> >> I’d like to fill out the HTML components to be full wrappers for simple >>HTML elements but there will be collisions with the “Basic” components. >>Currently the HTML components use library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic >><library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic> as their namespace. I think it >>makes sense to change that to library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/html >><library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/html> instead. >> >> Any objections to making that change? >> >> Harbs >> >
