Hi Carlos, does it mean, Adobe AIR will be taken further, and, only FlashPlayer will be discontinued in 2020? I couldn't find any information on that Flash update site …
https://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2017/07/adobe-flash-update.html Thanks, Sebastian On Jul 25, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I saw it some hours ago, and I must to say it seems very strange to me read > this movement. Let me explain: > > Although the world has gone "anti-flash" and the technology has very bad > press to many people that doesn't know really about it, I must to say that > the last months I was very happy with the progress in our company making a > mobile version of our main product. > > It took only one to two month make it work in Android and iOS Tablets, and > now we are making some visual changes via media queries to make tablets > more usable. We plan to release this versions after summer. > > So this means a very productive and short time to make that versions since > all Apache Flex codebase is valid and we are only "tweaking" some things to > make web and tablets more usable. > > I recently buy the new iPad Pro (10'5") and the performance of the Tablet > versions is Awesome. As performant as desktop versions. For us the minimum > version are Tablets from 2014-2015 period. > > So, I don't know what you think, but for me it's awesome to see our product > perform greatly and be deployable at last in such environments and with > much less investment that if we go the rewrite route with FlexJS or other > technology. I think for new products created from scratch would be better > to make it in a newer tech, but for legacy, this way is clearly better. > > So now in 2017, with phones and tablets with great power that can run flash > player (AIR) Apps, I think continue punishing a great tech is madness, and > making it go EOL is complexly absurd. > > I know we can't make anything, since such corporate announcement can't go > backwards, so at least my worries are for: > > a) Could go Flash Player the same route as Apache Flex? instead of EOL, > donate it? I think have it here inside Apache Flex would be a great > addition and we could control all the aspects of our project. If not we'll > end with Apache Flex 4.16 having the same sort. > > b) I read that Adobe AIR will not be affected and as well Flash Player and > AS3 inside Adobe AIR, but honestly knowing the way Adobe makes things, I > think that's what the say know, but things could change (as they should do) > when they want. > > What do you think? > > Note: one thing aside and a lesson know for 2010 to present is: Avoid use > *ANYTHING* from Adobe, since you'll end with your investments in the bin. > So Golden Rule for me is: "Avoid all Adobe Products". > > Best, > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-07-25 22:02 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Kwiatkowski < > nicholaskwiatkow...@gmail.com>: > >> Looks like we have a date : >> >> https://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2017/07/adobe-flash-update.html >> >> -Nick >> > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria.
