Excellent!  Very helpful.

I am still fixing issues of Dual and the TLF branch.  It found some good
bugs.

-Alex

On 5/30/17, 11:46 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I got the npm version of FlexJS 0.8.0 working with a couple of minor
>fixes.
>It looks good to go for the release!
>
>I also simplified how to test the npm version locally from the
>flex-utilities repo to make it download nightly builds (previously, you
>needed to manually change some JS code):
>
>cd flex-utilities
>npm config set flexjs:flexjs_custom_url
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheflex
>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Fflex-asjs_release_branch%2FlastSuccessfu
>lBuild%2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-flex-flexjs-0.8.0-bin.zip&data=02%7C01%7C
>%7C6aae6367bd7e4eaa377d08d4a78c45f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0
>%7C0%7C636317668292056590&sdata=EZoLyn6I3ZJRvc5oBkopcL%2B6AkHVyMvQ2wcMpWUO
>jN0%3D&reserved=0
>npm config set flexjs:falcon_custom_url
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheflex
>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Fflex-falcon%2520release%2520branch%2Flas
>tSuccessfulBuild%2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-flex-falconjx-0.8.0-bin.zip&dat
>a=02%7C01%7C%7C6aae6367bd7e4eaa377d08d4a78c45f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636317668292056590&sdata=VEQF%2FOi8%2FJjHregzU9JzAPT7Sv
>cG52ZaVd1yaMVstgc%3D&reserved=0
>npm install -g ./npm-flexjs/
>
>Those are the URLs to the latest builds from the release branches. It
>could
>be used with regular nightly builds from the develop branch and release
>candidate builds too.
>
>When you're done, you should delete the configuration keys:
>
>npm config delete flexjs:flexjs_custom_url
>npm config delete flexjs:falcon_custom_url
>
>- Josh
>
>On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I can test installing FlexJS 0.8.0 with NPM early next week, if no one
>> else finds the time. I don't remember the exact process of testing
>>locally
>> with a nightly build of FlexJS, but I think I figured it out pretty
>>easily
>> when I made some tweaks a while back.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm still working on the TLF fix.  I saw Josh's commit about Node
>>>support.
>>> Does someone have time to test out our Node/NPM stuff?  It might need
>>>some
>>> tuning after this dual-compile feature.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 5/26/17, 8:29 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On 5/26/17, 8:07 AM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Alex,
>>> >>
>>> >>That is correct I have FALCON_HOME set up. I will try as fast as I
>>>can
>>> >>run
>>> >>it once again, but there is possibility that will be on Sunday.
>>> >>
>>> >>Any chance to try by you also maven build with command line above ?
>>>I'm
>>> >>wondering if you also experience such issue as Santanu. Personally I
>>> >>didn't
>>> >>have it yesterday.
>>> >
>>> >I will try it when I get through this fix for the TLF branch.  For
>>>me, I
>>> >believe I've always had to separately use the Mavenizer to get
>>>com.adobe
>>> >artifacts.  I'm not sure if that's expected or not.  You might want to
>>> >check the archives to see if there is any mention of how to get
>>>com.adobe
>>> >artifacts.  I think there maybe issues with not having recent
>>>versions of
>>> >Maven and/or whether to use settings-template.xml.
>>> >
>>> >I don't want to take the time to help you look into this right now.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >-Alex
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to