I remember always having warnings reported by the old compiler, if there are no
constructors, so I started adding constructor blindly. Eventually that’s a
pattern others have been following?
Chris
Am 23.05.17, 12:22 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
We seem to have a number of empty constructors in the SDK. Is there any
reason for this as? Performance wise there’s going to be a cost with this.
On the other hand we also have a number of constructors that are not light
weight. AS doesn’t JIT code in constructors so best practice is to move the
code to a another method and call it from the constructor. Any reason this
isn’t being done?
Thanks,
Justin
