On 5/16/17, 8:28 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>At one point, I considered adding a flexjs-config.xml for JS-only >workflows. Seems like a good idea to me! And earlier we discussed swf-config.xml and maybe a swfair-config.xml. I'm a little concerned about -config.xml overwhelm, but maybe this is the best answer. Thoughts? -Alex > >- Josh > >On May 16, 2017 8:05 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >> On 5/16/17, 7:35 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >That worked, thanks. For some reason code completion in my hello world >>app >> >only works on the mxml elements, not in the script tag. >> > >> >> Hmm. Does code-completion work in .as files? >> >> What is the configuration you are using? I'm wondering if more SWCs >>need >> to be on the regular -library-path (instead of -swf-library-path and >> -js-library-path) for FB code completion. >> >> Now that -library-path is not appended to -swf-library-path and >> -js-library-path, it should mean that you can choose SWF or JS as the >> "primary" platform for an IDE that expects certain things on the >> -library-path. Then, if you want -library-path for SWF, you have to >>make >> sure all configurations are putting SWF SWCs on the -library-path (and >>not >> -swf-library-path) and put the JS SWCs on -js-library-path. And >> vice-versa if you want JS to be primary. >> >> That might mean that the frameworks/flex-config.xml is not set up the >>way >> you want it. Maybe we need flex-config.xml to be set up for SWFs and >>add >> a new flexjs-config.xml to be set up for JS-primary or JS-only users. >> >> Thoughts? >> -Alex >> >>
