On 4/18/17, 11:45 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>maybe fromJson is not the best example :) I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. Are you trying to support types in the JSON reviver? -Alex > > >On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd be happy to look at compiler side support for this at some point >> during the next month, it is something I have hand-coded many times and >>I >> think to/from JSON style support would be helpful for VO, especially >> bindables. It would need to add an interface I think so you could cast >>the >> VO in serialize/deserialize parts of service calls etc. >> >> e.g. creating VO from json: >> >> var myVO:VOClass = new VOClass() >> (myVO as IJSONable).fromJSON(jsonData) >> >> I know not everyone likes metadata, but this seems like a VO-specific >> metadata on the class, that the compiler would pick up on. It could even >> ignore [Transient] members if there are any. >> >> This keeps it away from being dependent on the reflection data and makes >> it specific to the classes that need it >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:23 PM, piotrz <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Alex, Harbs, >>> >>> I understand, but I thought that you will handle those method on the >>> compiler sight - Am I miss something ? >>> >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Apache Flex PMC >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development >>> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Issue-with-JSON-stringify-and- >>> Bindable-VO-objects-tp61195p61216.html >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>Nabble.com. >>> >> >>
