Nice interview, I'm sure it made some listeners curious about the summit.

I thought there was potential for confusion when you compared the move to
FlexJS to the move from Flex 3 to Flex 4. Flex 4 was backwards compatible
with Flex 3 and feature rich. I think we need to be careful that listeners
don't expect to see a feature rich FlexJS 1.0 that's compatible with Flex 4.

Other than that I thought you did a good job in putting things in a clear
context. Should also help me with my introduction talk.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Interview-on-the-FlexJS-Summit-tp61185p61187.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to