I’m getting this with a different project:
No GoogDep for NaN

I guess NaN needs to be added too?

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Progress!
> 
> It looks like the only problem I now have is the missing dependency on 
> org.apache.flex.core.Application
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>> OK.  I think I've fixed the getListOfFiles problem.
>> 
>> The Maven examples build seems to be turning on remove-circulars where the
>> Ant build doesn't.  That might need to be fixed up, but actually it helps
>> test the code paths in the dependency management.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 3/28/17, 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> There are lots of issues being dealt with so I don't know which one you
>>> are referring to.  I'm still working on the exception in getListOfFiles.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 3/28/17, 9:42 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Looking at you change, I doubt it’ll fix my problem because I WAS using
>>>> remove-circulars, but I’m trying anyway…
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hmm.   Looks like I broke something.  Even DataBindingExample didn't
>>>>> run.
>>>>> I just pushed a change to fix DataBindingExample and hopefully all
>>>>> other
>>>>> apps.  Please pull flex-falcon and try again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry about the delay,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/28/17, 7:13 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks, but I’m having bigger problems. Hopefully Alex will look into
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> other issues…
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have moved my new tests into the Ant integration tests, so they
>>>>>>> should no
>>>>>>> longer block you.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It was Josh’s tests that were tripping me up. The build fails after
>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> a wipe-all.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I’ve been having other problems with Falcon, and the latest logging
>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>> to shed some light on what’s wrong:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  [java] Dependencies calculated for 'org.apache.flex.states.
>>>>>>>> SetProperty'
>>>>>>>>  [java] org.apache.flex.states.SetProperty depends on
>>>>>>>> org.apache.flex.core.IDocument
>>>>>>>>  [java] No GoogDep for Uint8Array
>>>>>>>>  [java] No GoogDep for Uint32Array
>>>>>>>>  [java] org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.graph.GoogDepsWriter.
>>>>>>>> getListOfFiles(GoogDepsWriter.java:103)org.apache.flex.
>>>>>>>> compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.flexjs.MXMLFlexJSPublisher.publish(
>>>>>>>> MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java:311)org.apache.flex.compiler.
>>>>>>>> clients.MXMLJSC.compile(MXMLJSC.java:455)org.apache.
>>>>>>>> flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC._mainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:313)
>>>>>>>> org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.mainNoExit(
>>>>>>>> MXMLJSC.java:270)org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.
>>>>>>>> staticMainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:232)org.apache.flex.compiler.
>>>>>>>> clients.MXMLJSC.main(MXMLJSC.java:176)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It looks like an app which depends on BinaryData will fail. I’m
>>>>>>>> guessing
>>>>>>>> that for some reason falcon is trying to add requires for native JS
>>>>>>>> APIs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2017, at 7:13 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 3/26/17, 1:19 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I’m having trouble building Falcon.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like it’s failing because a text in FlexJSTestBase.java
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> failing. It’s looking for a file
>>>>>>>>>> flex-asjs/frameworks/as/basic-manifest.xml which does not exist.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That output has been there for months.  It isn't the cause of a
>>>>>>>>> failure.
>>>>>>>>> You have to find the test results and check the output in there.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to