Nice improvement.
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some before and after code to show you. I sent it out earlier but
> since I didn't see it come back into my inbox I'll assume the HTML I put into
> it didn't pass the filters, so I've put the code into a paste[1] below.
>
> I ran an example of the following MXML snippet. It is a series of nested
> Containers with different layouts.
>
> Notice that the "after" is much smaller and there are fewer style
> ingredients. You can see that in the original MXML the only specific size
> specified was width="200" on the g2 Container. In the "before" HTML, that 200
> appears in multiple places. In the "after" HTML, the 200 size appears only on
> the g2 <div>, corresponding to the g2 MXML Container. Now its up to HTML to
> maintain this structure and anything that happens to do (such as adding more
> children).
>
> Finally, if a Container were to have the <js:ScrollingViewport> bead added to
> it, the only thing you would see in the HTML is overflow:hidden would change
> to overflow:auto for that particular <div>.
>
> The SWF side hasn't been changed too much except that I have (at least I hope
> I have) improved the SWF-side layouts. Where the JS side may now only be as
> simple as style="display:flex; flex-flow:column", the SWF side will be an
> algorithm to mimic that. Over time I intend to improve that.
>
> Apache Paste URL: https://paste.apache.org/HzAS
>
