so i understand it correctly in the dual branch, the compiler produces one swc per type? And if you do pure js you use the js-swcs and if flash, you use the normal swcs?
Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Datum: 15.03.17 21:01 (GMT-05:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch Has anyone else looked at the dual branch? If you want to know more about it before it gets merged let me know soon, otherwise I am going to merge it. Thanks, -Alex On 3/11/17, 10:49 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >On 3/11/17, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >>Hi Alex, >> >>I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I >>should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two >>compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo >>and CompileJSMojo. I think now we need only one. If the current state it >>also looks as if both the AS and the JS mojo would do a dual compilation. >> >>If you confirm, that now I need only one Mojo, I would refactor it and >>create a “CompileLibMojo” and remove the other two CompileASMojo and >>CompileJSMojo. > >Well, we still build two SWCs per project. We might want to rename the >Mojos, but the CompileASMojo builds a SWC that has a library.swf with >COMPILE::SWF=true but includes JS files compiled with COMPILE::JS=true, >then CompileJSMojo builds a SWC that has a library.swf with >COMPILE::JS=true and the JS files with COMPILE::JS=true and the artifact >has the -js classifier. > >At some point we can try combining the two and renaming one of the >library.swf and catalog.xml files, but for now we still need a SWC with >library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true and a SWC with library.swf with >COMPILE::JS=true. > >Thanks, >-Alex >
