I'm not really paying much attention to webasm. Got too much to do right now.
Volunteers are welcome to make Flex->WebASM happen. The compiler is set up to have alternate emitters, but I'm wondering if it will be faster to leverage a different tool. We currently use Google Closure Compiler for optimizing JS. If Google comes up with a JS->WebASM compiler, we might leverage that instead. Of course, I could be wrong... -Alex On 3/13/17, 1:58 PM, "Jason Taylor" <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote: >So I'm sure many of you are aware that FireFox just added support for Web >Assembly, Chrome should have it in the next release, and IE will be >adding it shortly as well. Performance measurements on WebASM vs HTMl >are increadibe, and WebASM appears to be even way more performant than >Flash (in addition to way better multi-threading). > >I was wondering if anyone on the Flex teams is considering looking into >possibilities involving WebASM? I know it's far fetched but dosen't >hurt to ask right? In an ideal world the ability to cross compile >flash/flex apps to WebASM, or a Falcon output to WebASM for FlexJS. > >
