Hi Harbs 2017-02-13 10:09 GMT+01:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> I have no problem moving it to somewhere other than Core, but I cannot > think of a more logical place. It does not fit in anywhere. > > Unless we create a “Utils” project for all “non-esential” core-like > functionality, Core seems like the logical place. > > The only issue with including it in Core is that the swc is slightly > bigger and the Core build time is slightly longer. It has no effect on > applications built using Core. > I think people could suggest about what they think, if left where is now or suggest other place, but for me Core should be that...core...in other way we could end making it a hodgepodge. It's clear that the code will not go with you App if you don't reference it, but for the same way of thinking we could have only one big SWC library. Anyway, for me is only a suggestion since seems strange to me have it in Core. Thanks! Carlos
