I like Swiz too.. all the others need more code to get things started, but
I believe it's really tight to flex, if other mvc frameworks are easier to
port, I think you should go for the fastest way..

2017-02-10 8:57 GMT+00:00 OK <p...@olafkrueger.net>:

> Hi ,
> I don't want to start a framework discussion here but I'm loving PureMVC
> and
> would like to describe my point of view:
>
> I'm using PureMVC for years and these days it turns out that is more
> powerful than ever for me.
>
> I remember a lot of discussions regarding AS3 framework benchmarks and
> their
> particular features a few years ago. And I also remember that Cliff Hall
> (the author of PureMVC) was never tired to explain why PureMVC is like it
> is
> and why it doesn't implement the "hottest shit" [1].
>
> Years later I understand Cliffs ideas behind PureMVC more and more. Today
> we
> can just grab a copy of PureMVC and compile it to JavaScript... it works
> with FlexJS out of the box!
>
> The other big advantage of PureMVC is that it was ported to nearly any
> relevant programming language.
> And if there's no port for your favorite language available you've a fair
> chance to implement it by yourself cause PureMVC consist of just a few
> classes and interfaces.
> At the end this means that you've a faire chance to port your complete
> business logic of of your valuable apps to any other programming language.
> Maybe this will be never happen but to know that it would be possible
> calmed
> down ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
> [1] Quote of http://puremvc.org/
> While the "release early, release often" development philosophy can help a
> team learn what their product should do, if that product is a framework,
> adopters often tire of trying to hit a moving target. With PureMVC, we
> nailed down the scope early on, fixed the bugs, and let it be.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Injection-library-
> tp59177p59212.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to