On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 1/5/17, 2:35 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Cool. > > > >Suggestion: > > > >Instead of using a long prefix for the express components (i.e. > >express:TextInput), what about using something like jx instead (short for > >javascript express), so it would be jx:TextInput instead. If that looks > >to similar to js, maybe “ex”. or just “x” like the “s” prefix for spark. > > Actually, at some point any component from Basic that isn't "overridden" > by an Express version should get mapped into the Express namespace via the > manifest and "lookupOnly". We are doing this already for the Flat > components. > > Then all of the prefixes can be "js", but "js" can map to the Express > namespace. > > What do folks think about packing the express version of > DataBindingExample into one MXML file? >
After seeing Peter's email, I was thinking about the same thing. It would be nice to put up (in a tweet or blog) comparing the Flex4 with FlexJS, so having the app in one mxml file would be good. Thanks, Om > > Thoughts? > -Alex > >
