Hi, I think that one important thing that should be introduced in the standard, default, heavier component set should be a FlexJS original component set design. That should not be MDL, nor bootstrap or whatever other common out there. That should be created by a top designer that would want to be involved in this project.
Not taking this into account means people not using FlexJS, or using a set like MDL... What do you think? 2017-01-03 17:53 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > Hi, > > The original thread is another example of where PAYG becomes PITA. On > another thread, Om wants to bake in HTML sanitization by default. IMO, > these are things that should go in a heavier component set with more > things baked in. IMO, this new, heavier component set would be the > default for FlexJS. No more forgetting to add DataBinding beads, or > SimpleCSSValuesImpl, etc. Fewer tags to write. > > I've asked Peter to start on it so you can see how to bake stuff in and > how much simpler it will make our examples. I think it will help in > getting folks started with fewer problems. I think we've proven that we > can composite basic things into more complex things. > > But, we need a good name for this set. I don't like "Heavy". Makes me > think it would be too fat and slow. I've ruled out for now "Kitchen > Sink", and "Full" (because it won't contain every bead). I've thought > about "Medium", "Typical", "Common", "Popular", "POC" (Proof of Concept)", > "RP" (Rapid Prototyping). Don't like any of them. What name would > suggest that it is not on the place to start but that you could use it in > production if you don't run into size/performance issues? > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 1/2/17, 11:20 PM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >That's what I'm missing. It's a bit better cause when I add bead > >"ItemRendererDataBinding" my getter has been fired, although binding is > >still not working. I've just pushed my code. - Not sure what can be > >wrong. > > > >I have to admit I'm still thinking to much Flex instead of FlexJS :) > > > >Piotr > > > > > > > >----- > >Apache Flex PMC > >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >-- > >View this message in context: > >http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble. > com/FlexJS-MDL-Why-bindin > >g-is-not-working-in-MDL-example-tp57738p57795.html > >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
