I personally don’t like the convention to use comments. It feels more like a
hack than a language feature. But it’s not a show-stopper.
I would vote for [Externs] or @externs rather than /*@externs*/
On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> As an ASDoc tag, so /** @externs */
>
> On 12/13/16, 1:23 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you mean /*@externs*/ or @externs (which is currently not valid code)?
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/13/16, 12:48 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I’d really like to do would be to define a class like this:
>>>>
>>>> package
>>>> {
>>>> import stream.Stream;
>>>>
>>>> [Extern]
>>>> public class JSZip
>>>> {
>>>> public function generateNodeStream(nsp:NodeStreamParam):Stream{
>>>> return null;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>> And the compiler would know to generate externs from this class and it
>>>> should “just work”.
>>>>
>>>> This would make it MUCH easier to create swc libraries of externs as
>>>> well.
>>>
>>> File a JIRA. Although I would much rather use @externs instead
>>> [Externs]
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>
