2016-12-05 17:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > We could just fill HTML and HTML5 with the direct wrappers of elements. > Currently we are using more Flex-familiar names like Container and Label. > If we can think of a better SWC name for those things that's fine. The > point of HTML and Basic was that Harbs was finding it easier to work on > his app with a library that wrapped all Sprites. I want to make sure we > don't have to wrap all Sprites on the SWF side and am making compiler > changes to allow for that. Hopefully then we can remove the wrapped > Sprites, but it is a good exercise to have both just to make sure we don't > have too many assumptions in the other SWCs. You never know when there > might be a third platform besides SWF and JS that we want to target. > > If this project is successful, we should expect many additional platforms. If you see what happen to other projects out there like haxe, it's normal that people coming would want maybe iOS or Android or whatever and that people comes to implement this addition.
-- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
