On 12/5/16, 8:50 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Or define the width and height in the build and inject the values as
>defines?
>Would reduce it back to one place ☺
It would probably still need to be set on the MXML tag.
<js:Application width="..."
Would folks want to write their MXML as a template with replaceable
variables?
<js:Application width="${widthFromPOM}"
I don't really have an opinion either way. Is there precedence in Maven
for how this is typically done?
-Alex
>
>Chris
>
>Am 05.12.16, 17:05 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com>:
>
> The interesting question here is whether the compiler should somehow
>help
> the generation of the html wrapper since the compiler knows some
> information that the developer would otherwise have to duplicate,
>such as
> the width, height, and potentially the title and maybe other
>properties.
> These are MXML properties and the compiler can automatically see that
>you
> set width="500" or width="100$" and copy that to the output.
>Otherwise,
> if you decide to change your width to 700, you will have to change it
>in
> two places.
>
