Please post a small test case I can compile with MXMLC.
-Alex
On 11/20/16, 11:37 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes. This code is about 4 or 5 years old and I’ve had no errors to date.
>
>On Nov 21, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you sure MXMLC compiles your code without error? MXMLC reported the
>> "read-only" error for me.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 11/20/16, 10:44 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The latest Falcon breaks valid existing code patterns.
>>>
>>> I know there was a recent discussion on related, but I can’t find it
>>> right now.
>>>
>>> I have some code which I migrated from a Flash app:
>>>
>>> private var _regular:FontVO;
>>> public function get regular():FontVO
>>> {
>>> return _regular;
>>> }
>>> private function set regular(value:FontVO):void
>>> {
>>> _regular = value;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Somewhere else in the same class I have the following:
>>>
>>> if(style.toLowerCase() == "regular" ||
>>> style.toLowerCase() ==
>>> "normal"){
>>> regular = font;
>>> }
>>>
>>> This code compiled and worked correctly in Flash as well as in Falcon
>>> until today. I’m now getting an error:
>>> Property regular is read-only.
>>>
>>> regular = font;
>>> ^
>>>
>>> This code is in the same class, but the compiler is not recognizing the
>>> private setter.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harbs
>>>
>>
>
