On 11/16/16, 9:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I agree, and don’t mind reversing that. The question is where would that
>bead exist. The only dependency one Effects in HTML now, is in the form
>of an optional  bead that depends on HTML and Effects, namely
>EasyAccordionCollapseBead. Where do you propose to put it?

IMO, EasyAccordionCollapseBead should be renamed to
EasingAccordionCollapseBead, and be in the Effects.swc if it relies on
classes in Effects.swc.

-Alex

Reply via email to