On 11/16/16, 9:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I agree, and don’t mind reversing that. The question is where would that >bead exist. The only dependency one Effects in HTML now, is in the form >of an optional bead that depends on HTML and Effects, namely >EasyAccordionCollapseBead. Where do you propose to put it? IMO, EasyAccordionCollapseBead should be renamed to EasingAccordionCollapseBead, and be in the Effects.swc if it relies on classes in Effects.swc. -Alex