One thing I would really be dleighted about, would be, if we could get rid of
the patched libraries used in the sdk.
However I don’t have any idea what sideeffects this would have.
Chris
Am 03.11.16, 08:53 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
> Should we also take care of license issues cause we grab [2] and create a
> new file of it [3]?
[2] is MIT licensed so IMO it wouldn’t hurt it add a pointer of that MIT to
our LICENSE file. That way all bases are covered.
There is an issue here (similar with certain other 3rd parties) in they
don’t actualy have a MIT header or MIT license file we can copy (that I could
find from a quick look).
To comply with the MIT license file you need to include the license text.
There was a discussion on legal discuss about this recently the upshot being
you should contact the 3rd party and ask them (nicely) to add the license
test/header and/or add a header in our code for them.
Thanks,
Justin
