Hey Carlos,
Carlos Rovira wrote > Hi Olaf, I think is more about efficiency and optimization. AMF is binary, > more compacted and faster that any other method I known out there. Yes, Flex/AMF is definately faster and I remember the discussions years ago about AMF regarding performance. But even if it's faster I'm not sure if you really notice it cause often there're other bottle necks that slow down things. More over I think it depends on the use case to be really profit by the performance lead of AMF. Don't get me wrong, it would be great if FlexJS will support AMF but I'd also like to say that the current lack of AMF support is no show stopper that makes it impossible to use FlexJS. In best case people maybe could just add a facade on top of their current backend to be able to speak JSON over http. Anyway, you are my MDL super hero, thanks again for working on it !!! ;-) Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/AMFPHP-support-for-FlexJS-tp56066p56087.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
