I want to propose the same. I something was an experiment and is no more
developed. I think it should go to some folder that make people avoid
confusion about what code is valid and what is left behind.

2016-10-06 23:12 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:

> I stumble over tons of VF2JS classes and think it would be better to move
> stuf like that to some sort of attic. What do you think?
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 17:13:49
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FALCONJX] Combining SWF and JS compilers (was Re: AW:
> [FalconJX][FlexJS] COMPJSC and Build order)
>
> JSC is meant to be purely an ActionScript to JavaScript transpiler without
> any frameworks. By default, it doesn't export an HTML file, but it will
> optionally support custom HTML templates in 0.8.0. It is exposed through
> the js/bin/asjsc executable, where it loads the frameworks/js-config.xml
> configuration. js-config.xml references js.swc to give ActionScript access
> to browser APIs.
>
> NODE generates an index.js that bootstraps things for Node.js. It is
> exposed through the js/bin/asnodec executable, which it loads the
> frameworks/node-config.xml configuration. In addition to js.swc,
> node-config.xml references node.swc to give ActionScript access to Node.js
> APIs.
>
> As far as I know, AMD and VF2JS are no longer maintained. I assume AMD
> tried to output AMD modules instead of goog modules. I remember Alex or
> someone mentioning that VF2JS had something to do with the original Flex
> framework, but I don't know the details.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> >
> > yesterday I stumbled over this flexjs-dual output type while looking for
> > the correct settings to buid a pure JS app. Would it be possible for you
> > guys to give a short summary of what the different output types actually
> > are? The enum doesn't contain any documentation on this and I guess this
> > would be really helpful.
> >
> >
> > So far I see these output types:
> >
> > AMD
> > FLEXJS
> > GOOG
> > VF2JS
> > FLEXJS_DUAL
> > JSC
> > NODE
> >
> > And I guess I only used no value and FLEXJS
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 07:45:48
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: [FALCONJX] Combining SWF and JS compilers (was Re: AW:
> > [FalconJX][FlexJS] COMPJSC and Build order)
> >
> > Fred Thomas did some work in this area about a year ago.  In the
> > flex-oem-compiler module that FB (and maybe other IDEs) use to talk to
> the
> > compiler, he added a FLEXJS_DUAL -js-output-type.  Not sure how well it
> > works.
> >
> > Thinking about this some more we'd have to have the same configuration
> > options available to both compilers which might be a bit strange.  Or
> > maybe we can convince the compilers to not complain about unknown config
> > parameters.
> >
> > We'd have to decide on how to reset the library-path for each compile.
> > The JS compile might use different SWCs than the SWF compile.
> >
> > We'd have to select a few conditional compile options that would be
> > different for each compiler.  For example, COMPILE::SWF would be true for
> > SWF compiling and false for JS compiling and vice versa, and maybe
> finding
> > those params on the command-line would have no effect since they would be
> > dictated by the compiler.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/2/16, 1:45 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >That would be ideal!
> > >
> > >- Josh
> > >
> > >On Oct 1, 2016 10:47 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> One more thought on this:  now that COMPJSC can more or less build its
> > >>own
> > >> output instead of relying on COMPC to package its pile of .js files,
> it
> > >> might be worth experimenting with combining Falcon and FalconJX so
> COMPC
> > >> can produce a SWC or a SWC with JS files based on some configuration
> > >> parameter.  Then there would only be one compiler that produces SWFs
> or
> > >>JS
> > >> based on some -output-type flag.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 10/1/16, 10:18 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Hi Chris,
> > >> >
> > >> >When I read this, I realized I already pushed the changes when I
> pushed
> > >> >some other changes yesterday.  If the Maven build didn't blow up, it
> is
> > >> >probably because it is using its own compile-xx-config.xml files so
> is
> > >> >still generating a pile of .js files and packaging them up on the SWF
> > >> >COMPC run.
> > >> >
> > >> >-Alex
> > >> >
> > >> >On 10/1/16, 6:10 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >>Hi Alex,
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>so I guess ideally this change should be done on a feature branch,
> so
> > >>I
> > >> >>can sort out the Maven issues and we'll merge that back as soon as
> > >>all is
> > >> >>working. I would like to ask you to create a
> > >>"feature-autobuild/"-branch
> > >> >>for that. Just give me a short note what branch the stuff is in and
> > >>I'll
> > >> >>try to sort out the Maven issues.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>Chris
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>



-- 

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Reply via email to