Ok .. so Infra said, that renaming the repo would be a problem, but that there
shouldn't be any collisions with the SVN repo. So we could call it "flex-site"
... Any objections against me requesting infra to setup that "flex-site" repo?
Chris
________________________________
Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 09:23:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [Website] Proposal for the Git Site
Hi,
in order to proceed on this topic, I would like to propose the following means
of action:
1. I request a new git repo for our project (flex-site.apache.org or whatever
name we give it)
2. I create a maven branch in there and start implementing things as a maven
site
3. I create a maven-asf-site branch
4. I create a buildbot job to publish the site to that maven-asf-site branch
Others can add their versions of site generation to dedicated branches ("xyz")
to that repo too. Then they would also create buildbot build jobs to publish
"xyz" to "xyz-asf-site" ... we do a little discussion on the options and pick
one, finish the implementation and merge that branch to master/develop and
adjust the corresponding build job to publish to "asf-site". After that we ask
Infra to rename the repo and activate the gitpubsub thingy to use the new
asf-site branch content as our project website.
What do you think?
Chris
