On 9/29/16, 3:59 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I did wonder if this stuff could be refactored so that different parts of >the output were buffered and then output in sequence at the end instead of >having to use the postProcess approach, although I have no idea what >implications that might have for memory or speed. Does that make any >sense? A refactoring might help things, but who's going to do it and when? Right now my thinking is that what we have is good enough to get to 1.0 and maybe if we get momentum someone who knows this stuff better will show up and help us. We already do "buffer" with stringifyNode, But sometimes I think even stringifyNode calls stringifyNode. At some point, you have to put some code in the output file. -Alex
