Ok ... so it seems the Jars contain the META-INF/LICENSE file [1] requires.


The compiler-build-tools will probably not be built by the Ant release, but 
it's source will (I hope) definitely be part of the release sources.


Regarding [2], we are planning to publish binary artifacts, the binary 
distribution however is not part of the maven release. So the only thing that 
will be providing a "distribution" in this release, will be the Ant release. As 
soon as we had the time to consolidate the maven distribution module, we might 
think of using the maven distribution instead, but for now this is not a binary 
distribution.


Chris

________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2016 16:17:57
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0

Hi,

> Well I guess we are actually only voting on the Source Package that Alex is 
> going to build using the Ant build. The artifacts here are our Maven binary 
> build

We may need to vote on it, especially if it contains anything that’s not 
contained in the source package being voted on. See last few sentences of [1], 
Which I think (but not 100% sure) would include the first 2 repos you mentioned?

Also licenses and notice files for binary convenience releases often need 
different content. [2]

So looking at (for example) [3] I see it contains several class files. Is the 
source for these (for example HelpMojo) going to be included in the source 
release we are voting on?

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
3. 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1017/org/apache/flex/flexjs/compiler/compiler-build-tools/1.0.0/compiler-build-tools-1.0.0-source-release.zip

Reply via email to