Chris, fyi the BinaryData class is now almost the same as as3 ByteArray except for the amf part missing: writeObject/readObject and amf0/amf3 objectEncoding iirc. I think the only other difference is multibyte text methods missing as well. So it could be a good candidate for adding the missing amf support to....or perhaps a subclass because I know Alex mentioned the need to keep lighter options available for 'pay as you go' approach.
-Greg [sent from my phone] On 29/08/2016 8:19 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: I did write a J2ME serializer for AMF a while ago and I'm very familiar with the protocol. Eventually this would be a good thing for me to start writing some Cross-Compilable ActionScript ;-) As I see it the COMPILE:SWF part would be trivial ... Currently I'm sort of got my plate full with the upcomming conferences, but after that ... Chris ________________________________ Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com <carlos.rov...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> Gesendet: Montag, 29. August 2016 10:12:24 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] AMF support starting with in ECMAScript6? I commented in other threads in favor of AMF support since is a piece of the Flex eco system in witch many people based lots of apps out there. Supporting AMF in FlexJS means for many people change only the Flex(Flash) layer for FlexJS without touching server side part. In the other hand I continue to see AMF as a great option to comunicate data with the server. So I think it will be other piece that will make FlexJS a better option over its competitors. I don't know how much effort it could be. See some AMF js ports out there, but although it seems the base algorithms are in place, no body makes a RemoteObject that could compete with the ease of use in Flex making realy usable. So for me is a positive vote and will be, without doubt, a great addition to FlexJS Thanks for pointing this Chris Carlos 2016-08-26 16:25 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > > > On 8/26/16, 1:27 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >I am currently working on my FlexJS Talks slides and as part of that I am > >discussing the History of ECMAScript. While digging up the changes in > >ECMAScript, I noticed that version 6 introduced typed arrays. It sounds > >to me as if this would be great to start working on AMF support in FlexJS. > > > > > >Think this could be a nice excercise for me during the autumn and winter > >months ;-) > > AMF for JS has been discussed in the past. We could definitely use a > volunteer to work on it. One starting point might be [1] but not sure > about licensing and whether it actually works. > > [1] > http://www.jamesward.com/2010/07/07/amf-js-a-pure- > javascript-amf-implementa > tion/ > > > > > > >Do we have the ability to provide functionality based on the capabilities > >of the browser? > > > > I don't think we have any code that does that now. ES6 would be a > different emitter and probably not switched at runtime. I think folks > might serve different versions based on HTTP headers instead. > > You could also find a way to add code that does browser detection and load > polyfills. > > HTH, > -Alex > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
