A directive is fine. On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/7/16, 2:04 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes. That would be better (only 1.5KB), but only in this case. Assigning >> a null value to a string should not covert it into an empty string. >> >> I was suggesting to have an option to not do any conversions. >> >> Right now my code works without any string conversion at all. This is >> because of the “string-like” functions I added to XML and XMLList, as >> well as explicit conversions in the beginning of my function calls: > > I looked at your changes. That's a clever idea. It would probably fail > the typeof test. We could hack is/as to accept it as well if we want. > > We could add options to suppress conversions. I'd be tempted to do it at > the class or method level instead of as a configuration option that would > affect all files. We have "directives" like @flexjsignorecoercion that we > are already using to alter output. > > Thoughts? > -Alex >
