flex-extras is not affiliated (directly) with Apache, so we could do what we 
want there without worrying about all the legal nitty-gritty.

That’s why I created it…

If we'd want to bring it into the official Apache repo at some point, we’d have 
to do the legal vetting then.

On Aug 5, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

> Ah ok ... cause I have become committer in the JBurg project and could 
> initiate releases if there were problems with it ;-)
> 
> 
> @Justin ... if there is a project like "FlexORM" that is MIT licensed (even 
> if the website claims this and I couldn't find a single mention of this in 
> the sources), could I simply add a repo to flex-extras and even do releases 
> of it?
> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> ________________________________
> Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. August 2016 14:00:00
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Github place for non Apache Flex stuff?
> 
> No good reason. I had thought at one point that it might be a good place for 
> it.
> 
> We can remove it.
> 
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for that :-)
>> 
>> 
>> By the way, why is there jburg.jar in there? I did release a new version a 
>> while ago to Maven Central ...
>> 
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. August 2016 13:28:05
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Github place for non Apache Flex stuff?
>> 
>> I set this up a while back:
>> https://github.com/flex-extras
>> 
>> I just sent you an invite.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I remember recently someone was talking about creating an Github account 
>>> for locating non Apache Flex stuff. I am currently reviving several little 
>>> projects and think it would be good to do that publically. So If we had 
>>> something like that I could for example put that sort of stuff there. 
>>> Ideally I'd also setup a Maven central deployment for these using the 
>>> Sonatype OSS repo.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think there's a lot of good stuff out there, but the people working on it 
>>> have given up. For FlexORM for example it took me 3 Minutes to convert that 
>>> to a working Maven build. I think I could do that for a lot of "dead" 
>>> projects.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris
>> 
> 

Reply via email to