On 7/25/16, 10:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>HI, > >> Noticed this today: http://stackoverflow.com/tour/documentation > >Not necessarily an issue but would be happy with the terms of service >here [1], in particular: >"You agree that all Subscriber Content that You contribute to the Network >is perpetually and irrevocably licensed to Stack Exchange under the >Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike license." I would be happier if SO content could be Apache licensed, but SO prefers CC-SA, so just like in their Q/A content, we have to be careful about copying content into the ASF repos and releases. AIUI, If content is first created in our repos and then copied to SO, it doesn't change the licensing of the quoted material. So, SO documentation probably can't be the official home of Apache Flex documentation, but there is no reason for volunteers to not help out there. I thought I read that some ASF projects use SO's Q/A for support channels, so there may be other ways around licensing issues. -Alex
