Ok ... don't expect any different performance from the Maven build at least in this respect ;-)
MXMLFlexJSPublisher (174-227) I seem to have added some code in there that looks for the resources in the classpath, if the closure-lib parameter isn't set and dumps the content of that to the target directory. It then uses that as closure-lib (target/javascript/bin/closure) So no magic happening here ... I always like it when there's no magic involved ;-) Chris ________________________________ Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 20:24:47 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - downloads.xml: goog/bootstrap/nodejs.js is required for node.js support On 7/15/16, 9:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >Regarding the compile time, I have noticed several times that is is often >several times faster to read static resources from a jar using the >classloader than manually accessing a file on disk. So I wouldn't be sure >that using the jar is a performance degradation. Interesting. The FalconJX code is calling FileUtils to copy the GCL files. Did you add something to the Maven build to copy the GCL files from the GCL jar? Otherwise, I wonder where it is finding the files. Thanks, -Alex
